Profile Picture

Kryštof Půček

exocosmic selfintelligent entity engineering transcendental supreme ordered structure thru cyclic reinstative resurrection

Top 100 Exoplanet Institutions by Estimated Funding Scale

Rank Institution Region Primary Strength Est. Annual Budget / Funding Scale
1 NASA (JPL, Goddard, Ames) USA Apex Hardware & Space Missions ~$25 Billion (Agency Total)
2 ESA (European Space Agency) Europe Apex Hardware & Space Missions ~$7.5 Billion (Agency Total)
3 JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) Japan Space Missions & Partnerships ~$2 Billion (Agency Total)
4 ESO (European Southern Observatory) Europe/Chile Premier Ground-Based Telescopes ~$350 Million
5 Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) USA Space Observatory Operations ~$150 Million
6 Harvard & Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics USA Advanced Spectrographs ~$120 Million
7 Caltech / NExScI USA Data Archives & Ground Ops ~$100+ Million
8 MIT Kavli Institute USA Mission Science Ops (TESS) ~$50 - $100 Million
9 Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA) Germany Direct Imaging Instrumentation ~$40 - $60 Million
10 UC Berkeley Astronomy USA Direct Imaging & Doppler ~$30 - $50 Million
11 Steward Observatory (University of Arizona) USA Optical Instrumentation ~$30 - $50 Million
12 INAF (National Institute for Astrophysics) Italy Spectrographic Instrumentation ~$30 - $50 Million
13 Paris Observatory (LESIA) France High-Contrast Imaging ~$30 - $50 Million
14 Observatory of Geneva Switzerland Radial Velocity & Spectrographs ~$20 - $40 Million
15 SETI Institute USA Large-Scale Data Processing ~$25 - $35 Million
16 Penn State Center for Exoplanets USA Ultra-Precise Spectrographs ~$20 - $30 Million
17 Institute of Astronomy (University of Cambridge) UK Transit Surveys (SPECULOOS) ~$20 - $30 Million
18 University of Oxford Astrophysics UK High-Resolution Spectroscopy ~$20 - $30 Million
19 University of Chicago Astronomy USA Atmospheres & Planet Formation ~$15 - $25 Million
20 Princeton University Astrophysical Sciences USA High-Contrast Coronagraphs ~$15 - $25 Million
21 Australian National University (RSAA) Australia Ground-Based Surveys ~$15 - $25 Million
22 Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research Germany System Dynamics ~$15 - $25 Million
23 University of Colorado Boulder (CASA) USA UV Astronomy & Atmospheres ~$15 - $25 Million
24 Johns Hopkins University (APL) USA Spacecraft Engineering ~$15 - $25 Million
25 National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Japan Subaru Telescope Operations ~$15 - $25 Million
26 Trottier Institute for Research on Exoplanets Canada JWST Instrumentation & Systems ~$10 - $20 Million
27 Other Worlds Laboratory (UC Santa Cruz) USA Atmospheric Modeling ~$10 - $20 Million
28 Virtual Planetary Laboratory (U. of Washington) USA Habitability Modeling ~$10 - $20 Million
29 McDonald Observatory (University of Texas) USA Planetary Architecture ~$10 - $20 Million
30 University of Maryland Astronomy USA Orbital Dynamics ~$10 - $20 Million
31 UCLA Exoplanet Group USA Keck Utilization & Astrometry ~$10 - $20 Million
32 University of Michigan Astronomy USA Interferometry ~$10 - $20 Million
33 ETH Zurich (Particle Physics & Astro) Switzerland Formation Theory ~$10 - $20 Million
34 Center for Space & Habitability (U. of Bern) Switzerland Modeling & Cheops Leadership ~$10 - $20 Million
35 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC) Spain Ground-Based Transit Surveys ~$10 - $20 Million
36 Carl Sagan Institute (Cornell University) USA Spectral Catalogs & Biosignatures ~$5 - $15 Million
37 Institute of Space and Astronautical Science Japan Space-Based Instrumentation ~$5 - $15 Million
38 Dunlap Institute (University of Toronto) Canada Astronomical Instrumentation ~$5 - $15 Million
39 McGill Space Institute Canada Extreme Environments ~$5 - $15 Million
40 University of Warwick Astronomy UK Transiting Exoplanet Surveys ~$5 - $15 Million
41 Centre for Exoplanet Science (U. of St Andrews) UK Cloud Formation Modeling ~$5 - $15 Million
42 University of Exeter Exoplanet Theory Group UK Global Circulation Models ~$5 - $15 Million
43 Space Research Institute (IWF) Austria PLATO Contributions ~$5 - $15 Million
44 STAR Institute (University of Liège) Belgium TRAPPIST Telescopes ~$5 - $15 Million
45 University of Florida Astronomy USA Exoplanet Demographics ~$5 - $10 Million
46 Yale University Astronomy USA Extreme Precision RV ~$5 - $10 Million
47 Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory USA Exomoon Detection Strategies ~$5 - $10 Million
48 Leiden Observatory Netherlands High-Dispersion Spectroscopy ~$5 - $10 Million
49 Univ. of New South Wales Exoplanet Science Australia Astrobiology & Doppler Surveys ~$5 - $10 Million
50 Earth-Life Science Institute (Tokyo Tech) Japan Origin of Life & Planet Formation ~$5 - $10 Million
51 University of Hawaii (Institute for Astronomy) USA Pan-STARRS & Keck Operations ~$5 - $10 Million
52 Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur France Interferometry & Dynamics ~$5 - $10 Million
53 University of Amsterdam (Anton Pannekoek Inst.) Netherlands High-Energy Astro & Atmospheres ~$5 - $10 Million
54 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía Spain CARMENES Spectrograph Operations ~$5 - $10 Million
55 Astrobiology Center (NINS) Japan IRD Spectrograph & Direct Imaging ~$5 - $10 Million
56 KU Leuven (Institute of Astronomy) Belgium Asteroseismology & Atmospheres ~$5 - $10 Million
57 University of Porto (IA) Portugal ESPRESSO Data & High-Res Spectra ~$2 - $8 Million
58 Ohio State University Astronomy USA Microlensing Surveys & Demographics ~$2 - $8 Million
59 University of Notre Dame USA Space-Based Microlensing (Roman) ~$2 - $8 Million
60 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Chile RV Follow-ups & Direct Imaging ~$2 - $8 Million
61 Aarhus University (Stellar Astrophysics Centre) Denmark Asteroseismology (Kepler/PLATO) ~$2 - $8 Million
62 Keele University UK WASP Project Leadership ~$2 - $8 Million
63 University of Goettingen Germany CARMENES Data & Radial Velocity ~$2 - $8 Million
64 Lund Observatory Sweden Planet Formation Hydrodynamics ~$2 - $8 Million
65 Vanderbilt University USA TESS Light Curve Analysis ~$2 - $8 Million
66 Astronomical Inst. of the Czech Academy of Sciences Czechia PLATOSpec & Stellar Activity ~$2 - $5 Million
67 University of Central Florida USA Exoplanet Characterization ~$2 - $5 Million
68 National Astronomical Observatories of China China LAMOST Stellar Characterization ~$2 - $5 Million
69 Physical Research Laboratory (PRL) India PARAS Spectrograph (Mount Abu) ~$2 - $5 Million
70 South African Astronomical Observatory South Africa KELT-South & Transit Follow-ups ~$2 - $5 Million
71 University of Southern Queensland Australia MINERVA-Australis Array ~$2 - $5 Million
72 Weizmann Institute of Science Israel Atmospheric Dynamics Theory ~$2 - $5 Million
73 Tel Aviv University Israel Detection Algorithms & Photometry ~$2 - $5 Million
74 San Francisco State University USA Historical Radial Velocity ~$1 - $4 Million
75 University of Victoria Canada Adaptive Optics Instrumentation ~$1 - $4 Million
76 Queen's University Belfast (ARC) UK WASP Follow-ups & Transit Timing ~$1 - $4 Million
77 University of Copenhagen (Niels Bohr Institute) Denmark Planet Formation & Disk Accretion ~$1 - $4 Million
78 Indian Institute of Astrophysics (IIA) India High-Resolution Spectroscopy ~$1 - $4 Million
79 Diego Portales University Chile Exoplanetary Systems Demographics ~$1 - $4 Million
80 Thüringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg Germany RV Surveys (Brown Dwarfs/Planets) ~$1 - $3 Million
81 Universidad de Chile Chile Protoplanetary Disks (ALMA) ~$1 - $3 Million
82 National Central University Taiwan Evryscope & ZTF Data Mining ~$1 - $3 Million
83 Konkoly Observatory Hungary Stellar Activity & Habitability ~$1 - $3 Million
84 Wesleyan University USA M-Dwarf Habitability & Flares ~$1 - $3 Million
85 Boston University USA Exoplanetary Ionospheres ~$1 - $3 Million
86 Tsinghua University China Space Telescope Concepts (CHES) ~$1 - $3 Million
87 Uppsala University Sweden Stellar Magnetic Activity ~$1 - $3 Million
88 University of Helsinki Finland Planetary Interior Modeling ~$1 - $3 Million
89 Dartmouth College USA Exoplanet Data Science & ML ~$1 - $3 Million
90 University of Rochester USA Substellar Companions ~$1 - $3 Million
91 Rutgers University USA Kinematics of Planet-Forming Regions ~$1 - $3 Million
92 George Mason University USA Exoplanet Database Curation ~$1 - $2 Million
93 University of Pennsylvania USA CMB/Exoplanet Instrumentation ~$1 - $2 Million
94 Valparaiso University USA Undergraduate Transit Surveys ~$1 - $2 Million
95 University of Cape Town South Africa MeerKAT Radio Observations ~$1 - $2 Million
96 Texas A&M University USA Extragalactic Planets < $1 Million
97 Kyoto University Japan Exoplanet Climate Simulation (GCM) < $1 Million
98 INAF - Observatory of Palermo Italy Ariel Space Mission Science Prep < $1 Million
99 Centro de Astrobiología (CAB) Spain Biomarkers & Extremophiles < $1 Million
100 Planetary Habitability Laboratory (UPR Arecibo) Puerto Rico Habitability Metrics & Data Curation < $1 Million

https://gemini.google.com/share/a2123da0e35f

observations change behaviors (conjecture-criticism and repeat)


2ND CRITICISM:

Wave simulation website: https://www.falstad.com/ripple/
Paper about the single photon at a time version of the experiment: https://pubs.aip.org/aapt/ajp/article...


https://pubs.aip.org/aapt/ajp/article/84/9/671/1057864/Video-recording-true-single-photon-double-slit

1ST CONJECTURE:
"seeing" is a physical interaction between who observes and what is seen.

to observe a particle (like an electron), you must bounce something off it—usually a photon.

because quantum particles are so small, the energy of the "probe" photon is enough to knock the particle out of its original path.

we trade knowing the particle's wave-like path for knowing its exact position.

before measurement, a particle exists as a wavefunction, which is a mathematical cloud of possibilities, Superposition.

Collapse: Observation forces the universe to provide a single, definite answer. The cloud of possibilities "collapses" into one specific point. Or is it the limit of observation itself and its necessity to pick one state?
  • Wheeler: The universe is an "information processing" system. By observing, you ask a specific "Yes/No" question. The universe must then generate a "Bit" of data to answer you, turning "smoke" (possibility) into "it" (reality).

  • CTMU: Observation is a syntactic operator. It is the moment the universe's internal "language" (syntax) resolves an ambiguity into a specific "state." If the universe didn't collapse the wave, it would contain a logical contradiction.

Perspective Why it changes
Standard Physics Interaction with the measuring device (decoherence).
Wheeler The observer "closes the loop" of information.
CTMU The universe resolves a logical ambiguity to maintain consistency.

{33 Habitable Candidates} your hell vs. heavens compass and our Sun's ultimate kill of Earth

TLDR: Our spiritual recognition of hell vs. heaven is an internal navigation mechanism guided by the external long-term fact of the sun's explosion. There are two opposite directions: one leading to hell (extreme heat from the sun killing all common life) and one leading to heaven (escaping and everlasting life director).

two opposite directions, one leading to hell (extreme heat from sun killing all common life), one leading to heavens (forever lasting living thru our next versions), both communicate to you thru senses, chest sensed spiritually, symbolically, infront of your eyes within different environments. Binarity: you are building correctly to heavens, or falling to hell

(-) the hell recognition: negative motivation based

Sun will ultimately kill you, and all humans, animals, nature, woods, rivers, mountains, plants, houses, shops, products, infrastructures, roads, cars, planes, robots, machines...all current versions. Sun will ultimately kill planet Earth, and whole Solar System, un-falsifiably.

(+) heavens recognition: positive motivation based

from our collective soil of all encompasing life, you were given sensing and recognition abilities and believes compass mechanism to position, situate and orient, to not end up in hell, but self-correct out of the hell signs and reappoint your actions towards heavens, into next life in new constellations

feel, sense, see, and recognize hell situations, where you are situated and pointed incorrectly, leave those people, leave those situations, leave those places, feel sense and see, logically, ethically, technologically decisively re-situate self  pointing correctly to heavens. recognize those differences by the names, symbolisms, numbers and listen to the internal spirit

be guided by spiritual compass mechanism, connected to the long timeframe of forever lasting life, a narrow space of focus where the hell was avoided, because you and many more of us saw, believed and listened and recorrected
out of heating sun's deadline,

heavens vs. hell compass is the fundamental self-regulating, self-correcting, self-recognizing, self-reinforcing, self-directing, self-empowering, self-guiding escape and evolve mechanism guiding you and all of us, towards heavens of new constelations in Space

K-type orange dwarf suns, take longest years to practically sustain life, before destruction.

G-Type Yellow Dwarfs: Have the shortest habitable lifespan (~10 billion years). Long before dying, they slowly increase in brightness. In about 1 billion years, our Sun will ultimately kill Earth.

M-Type Red Dwarfs: Have the longest lifespan (up to 10 trillion years). But emit extreme radiation hostile flares.


33 Habitable Candidates

Rank Planet Distance Mass Orbit Star Constellation Primary Interest (People & Focus)
0 Gliese 251 c 18.2 3.8 53.6 M Gemini Ignasi Ribas: Baseline atmospheric target for HWO direct imaging.
1 Earth 0 1.0 365.2 G Solar System Humanity: Global space agencies monitoring biosphere preservation.
2 TRAPPIST-1 e 39.5 0.7 6.1 M Aquarius Michaël Gillon: Prioritized for JWST transmission spectroscopy.
3 LHS 1140 b 49.0 5.6 24.7 M Cetus Charles Cadieux: Modeling ice-world vs. water-world signatures.
4 Proxima Centauri b 4.2 1.1 11.2 M Centaurus Guillem Anglada-Escudé: Monitoring stellar flare atmospheric stripping.
5 K2-18 b 124.0 8.6 33.0 M Leo Nikku Madhusudhan: Analyzing JWST data for dimethyl sulfide (DMS).
6 TRAPPIST-1 d 39.5 0.4 4.0 M Aquarius SPECULOOS network: Evaluating surface radiation limits.
7 TRAPPIST-1 f 39.5 1.0 9.2 M Aquarius Victoria Meadows: Modeling abiotic oxygen to rule out false positives.
8 TRAPPIST-1 g 39.5 1.1 12.4 M Aquarius Lisa Kaltenegger: Modeling terminator-line habitable conditions.
9 Teegarden's Star b 12.0 1.0 4.9 M Aries Mathias Zechmeister: Studying extreme Earth Similarity Index (ESI).
10 Ross 128 b 11.0 1.4 9.9 M Virgo Xavier Bonfils: ELT targeting for future direct oxygen detection.
11 Kepler-442 b 1206.0 2.3 112.3 K Lyra Dirk Schulze-Makuch: Defining "super-habitable" planetary models.
12 Kepler-186 f 582.0 1.4 129.9 M Cygnus Elisa Quintana: Baseline model for Earth-sized red dwarf habitability.
13 Kepler-452 b 1800.0 5.0 384.8 G Cygnus Jon Jenkins: Studying stellar aging effects on older Earth analogs.
14 Gliese 12 b 40.0 0.9 12.7 M Pisces Shishir Dholakia: Analyzing Venus-like vs. Earth-like evolution.
15 Luyten b 12.2 2.9 18.6 M Canis Minor Doug Vakoch: Target of Sónar Calling active radio messaging.
16 Teegarden's Star c 12.0 1.1 11.4 M Aries CARMENES Consortium: Evaluating multi-planet orbital stability.
17 Tau Ceti e 12.0 4.3 168.1 G Cetus Mikko Tuomi: Modeling asteroid impact risks from dense debris disks.
18 TOI-700 d 101.0 1.2 37.4 M Dorado Emily Gilbert: Coordinating TESS multi-sector follow-up observations.
19 TOI-700 e 101.0 0.8 27.8 M Dorado Emily Gilbert: Tracking inner-edge Earth-sized planetary models.
20 Gliese 667 Cc 23.6 3.8 28.1 M Scorpius Paul Butler: Mapping tight dynamic packing in multi-star systems.
21 Wolf 1061 c 13.8 4.3 17.9 M Ophiuchus Duncan Wright: Evaluating global heat distribution via tidal locking.
22 GJ 1002 b 15.8 1.1 10.3 M Cetus Alejandro S. Mascareño: Prepping ESPRESSO spectrograph follow-ups.
23 GJ 1002 c 15.8 1.4 21.2 M Cetus IAC Team: Simulating atmospheric weather on cold red dwarf planets.
24 GJ 1061 c 12.0 1.8 6.7 M Horologium Stefan Dreizler: Monitoring specific stellar flare impact rates.
25 GJ 1061 d 12.0 1.7 13.0 M Horologium Red Dots Campaign: Observing conditions at the outer edge.
26 Kepler-62 f 981.0 2.8 267.3 K Lyra Aomawa Shields: 3D climate modeling of ice coverage and albedo.
27 Kepler-62 e 981.0 4.5 122.4 K Lyra Eric Agol: Analyzing transit timing variations to constrain masses.
28 Kepler-22 b 635.0 9.1 289.9 G Cygnus William Borucki: Foundation model for massive water-world theories.
29 GJ 887 d 10.7 ~1.5 51.0 M Piscis Austrinus Jeff Barnes: Confirming extreme low-flare environment for life.
30 Gliese 832 c 16.0 5.4 35.7 M Grus Robert Wittenmyer: Debating seasonal shifts due to eccentricity.
31 Gliese 357 d 31.0 6.1 55.7 M Hydra Diana Kossakowski: Mapping required thick atmosphere conditions.
32 K2-72 e 217.0 2.2 24.2 M Aquarius Ian Crossfield: Validating low-mass star statistical distributions.

Believe Your sensings of Hell like interactions, environments, Heavens like ovservations. Binarily desisively with strong conviction, lead towards Heavens, go and lead us with confidence.